US SENATE: Singh Has Raised $446K, But Campaign Has A Lower “Net Value” Than Flanagan Campaign

Thanks to COVID-19 there really hasn’t been much to write about lately. How many times can we say we are being stripped of our civil liberties?

Reading the stories of how much money the Republican candidates for US Senate have raised, and how much they have in the bank, got me thinking. My first thought? How in the hell did Hirsh Singh spend $418,287!

Seriously, Singh spent $418,287! He’s won four county lines. By my math he has spent $104,571.75 per county line. Even Bob Hugin didn’t spend that much to win a county line, and he spread some serious money around.

According to New Jersey Globe Singh has raised $445,969 so far, spent $418,287, has $26,582 cash-on-hand and debt of $45,355. This means the Singh campaign has a “net value” of ($18,773). NEGATIVE $18,773!

Conversely, long-shot social media campaigner Tricia Flanagan, according to New Jersey Globe, has raised $14,836 to date and has $2,234 on-hand. She lists no debt meaning her campaign has a “net value” of $2,234. $21,007 more value than the Singh campaign.

The fact that I’m writing the Flanagan campaign has more financial value than the Singh campaign speaks volumes!

Frontrunner candidate Rik Mehta has $181,164 cash-on-hand. To be fair I would imagine his campaign is carrying some debt, but like for Singh and Flanagan I’m only writing what was reported. Debt or not, Mehta’s campaign obviously has the highest net value of the candidates.

Basically, this means that the person connected to the Singh campaign who called me on March 23 at 4:20PM and spent 12 minutes and 30 seconds telling me that Mehta’s campaign was broke and had no money was talking out of their butt.

I guess this means the continued not always completely honest attacks on Mehta are going to continue. I suppose that’s the price one pays for being the clear frontrunner.